Efficacy and safety of DMEK versus DSAEK: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Saiqun Li, Liangping Liu, Wei Wang, Ting Huang, Xingwu Zhong, Jin Yuan, Lingyi Liang
PLoS One. 2017; 12(12): e0182275.
The surgical management of corneal decompensation has traditionally been with full thickness corneal transplantation or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and more recently with lamellar transplantation techniques such as Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), in which the Descemet’s membrane endothelial complex is transplanted with a sheet of stroma, and Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), in which the Descemet’s membrane endothelial complex is transplanted in isolation and attached in a suture-free method through gas tamponade.
In this meta-analysis, the authors evaluated 19 published articles comparing the outcomes of DSAEK and DMEK. The overall pooled estimates demonstrated a significantly superior post-operative best corrected visual acuity, a comparable endothelial cell density, and an increased graft detachment rate in the DMEK group compared with the DSAEK group.







