I was fortunate to attend November 2025’s one-day Australian Ophthalmic Nurses Association (AONA) Congress, held annually alongside the RANZCO congress. There was such a great turnout from the ophthalmic nursing community that if you didn’t get there early for each session you’d risk missing out on a seat!
There were some great medical, nursing and industry updates and new innovations presented, with a wide variety of topics for ophthalmic nurses from all areas of practice. After a warm welcome by AONA president Lesley McDowell, keynote Julia Costello talked about the importance of expanding our field of view, highlighted with a case study where missed flags in assessment can lead to delays in diagnosis.
Corneal tattooing and identity
Amy Chumkasian, along with her colleague Dr Prakshi Chopra, gave a very interesting presentation on corneal tattooing, discussing the history of its development. It was upsetting to learn that the practice was carried out on children in Auschwitz in World War Two, presumably with an experimental aim. Our speakers outlined that, these days, the purpose of corneal tattooing is to reduce the amount of light entering the eye for conditions such as albinism, aniridia and traumatic iris defects. Research has shown corneal tattooing can help reduce stress and social anxiety for these patients, improving their satisfaction and proving a less invasive option than other procedures. In some countries this procedure is offered for purely cosmetic reasons and, while a relatively safe option, it is not without risk. The potential for vision loss and other complications were highlighted as important discussion points for patients, as outlined by the AAO last year.
Chumkasian also provided a good reminder about the importance of the eye as part of people’s identity, reflecting on the importance of nursing care in providing support and education. Interesting to know that in the state of Victoria, an unlicensed practitioner providing corneal tattooing can be fined or sentenced to prison. (In New Zealand, such procedures are effectively restricted through a combination of local council bylaws and national health law, which limit invasive eye procedures to registered health practitioners acting within their scope of practice.)










