Periocular triamcinolone vs intravitreal implants for the treatment of uveitic macular oedema: the POINT trial.
Ophthalmology 2019;126(2):283-295.
Design: 192 adult patients with non infectious uveitic macular oedema were randomised 1:1:1 to periocular triamcinolone acetonide, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, and intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the PeriOcular vs Intravitreal Corticosteroids for Uveitic Macular Edema (POINT) Trial. The primary outcome measure was proportion of baseline subfield thickness at eight weeks.
Outcome: All treatment groups demonstrated improvement by eight weeks. There was a reduction in macular thickness compared to baseline of 23% for periocular triamcinolone, 39% for intravitreal triamcinolone and 46% for dexamethasone implant. The intravitreal treatments were superior to periocular and the dexamethasone implant was non inferior to intravitreal triamcinolone. At eight weeks, the periocular steroid group had gained 4.4 letters, intravitreal triamcinolone 9.7 and dexamethasone implant 9.5. The risk of IOP ≥24mmHg has higher in the intravitreal treatment group but no difference was observed between intravitreal triamcinolone and dexamethasone implant.
Limitations: Follow up extended out to 24 weeks, but a longer period would be useful to examine cataract formation following intravitreal compared to periocular treatment. It is also unknown to what extent these results may be generalised to the treatment of other macular oedema, for example, following cataract surgery.
Comment: This study shows an advantage in intravitreal therapy for the management of uveitic macular oedema with greater improvement in macular thickness and visual acuity. Contrary to expectation, no difference in intraocular pressure rise was observed between intravitreal triamcinolone and the dexamethasone implant.









