Following the release of three-month interim findings1, the Ocular Surface Laboratory (OSL) team has now completed the full six-month analysis of a trial comparing handheld thermal pulsation therapy with traditional warm compress treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)2.
The investigator-masked, randomised controlled trial involved 77 participants with MGD and dry eye disease (DED). A single treatment using the Alcon Systane iLux device (not currently commercially available in New Zealand) was compared to daily warm compress therapy and followed up monthly for six months. Both groups showed significant improvements in symptoms and clinical signs over the study period.
The key difference emerged in expressed meibum quality, where the thermal pulsation group demonstrated sustained improvements from month three onwards – an outcome not observed in the warm compress group. This suggests thermal pulsation has the potential to provide a more targeted treatment effect, by safely delivering heat directly to the meibomian glands from the inner conjunctival surface of the eyelid, combined with simultaneous clinician-guided manual expression using a single disposable tip.








